Demise of rural
places of worship raises questions about our belief systems
This was written by
Ron Macinnis who authors a column titled LIVING IN THE PROMISED LAND for the Halifax Herald in Halifax ,
Nova Scotia . I was taken by his words because they
reminded me of an earlier time in my life and the virtues that were such an
integral part of the values, and that were so ingrained in our character and
how we related to others. True, it was a
simpler life but, I believe, it was a better life because we did not have the
diversions that took our attention away from those with whom we shared our
lives and the community in which we lived.
We genuinely cared about one
another and we were always ready to lend a helping hand whenever and wherever
it was needed. We did not have the
wonders of the electronic age to trump our ability to talk to and relate to one
another. Each day was there for us to
appreciate the essence of the life we shared and, above all else, to feel the
pain and suffering that was often our common lot, but which were to be endured
in one form or another.
The churches which
were willingly supported by the people of those small towns sustained us and
kept hope alive when that was about all we had. That compassion is a characteristic I truly
miss. Nothing about what passes for
“fun” and the mountain of visceral and material pleasures we covet today could
ever tap into those finer aspects of what we were as human beings and which
were a cherished part of each day we lived.
Those churches may look like tombs, but to some of us we know that deep
within the recesses of those silent structures is a box of treasures somewhere from
a golden age when people had character and decency but, sadly, seem long forgotten
in the din, hustle and bustle of today’s hectic pace of life.
Are we really any
better now?
Cowboy Bob
The Sagebrush
Philosopher
February 19, 2014
******
What I saw in my travels one day stopped me dead in my
tracks. It was in that moment that full
impact of the metaphoric content of the scene hit me.
For here was a vision that underlined the reality of what
we, as a society, have done: we have, for all intents and purposes, albeit
unavoidably put our churches, and all they stood for, out on the street.
While it is true that some of our old, gracious, highly
symbolic, old rural Nova Scotia church buildings have been “repurposed,” and
their physical form will take on new function, their demeanor, their aura,
their evocative spirit and their important role as a gathering place will
change indelibly, and in that I find there is, for our rural communities, a
monumental loss of something deeply important to us all.
It is hard to know where to start with this one: maybe with a nostalgic drive through our
little rural hollows and hamlets, and the warming, esthetic pleasure I have
derived from the presence of the tidy, little white churches dotting the green
countryside, and how they spoke to me as would an open-armed, warm-and-welcome
greeting on the doorstep of a friend – this would be a good place to stop and
meet some of the folk, I would think. Or
if need be, for whatever reason, I could find help. And certainly, at a deep level our churches
spoke to me, based on my experience in rural community development, of the
important role they played in holding our communities together: of the dinners, of Christmas baskets, of the
outreach to those in need and the endless but socially bonding conversations
that took place when people got together as they did in the old days. And, of course, there was the music,
sometimes nothing short of spectacular.
Perhaps most important, though, all of these churches stood
for the virtues of compassion, of forgiveness, of loving one’s neighbor, of the
importance of community and of keeping that fabric together. I must say, in the years of community work I
did in a small village, churches played a vital role in stitching community
fabric together. But it was one of
ever-diminishing impact: One could see their
disappearance coming for years in the rising tide of grey hair in the
pews.
Why may that have been?
Perhaps because of the seeds of the demise of the church
were planted many years ago. I explored
this at depth once out of curiosity and was gripped by the tale, tragic as it
was.
Somehow, over time, the simple but beautiful everyday
teachings of the man, Jesus, ended up being bought and sold by the early
church’s heavenly gatekeepers: many of those precious lessons, scratched in the
sand on a beach, became tangled in rhetoric, overrun with twisted brambles of
myth and ritual, and frightening tales of a petulant, demanding and vengeful
god who could all but hurl thunderbolts if He got ticked.
And then there was the added burden through the centuries of
rising costs to pay for buildings, the construction of which was specifically
and ironically declared irrelevant by the church’s own spiritual master. (“For where two or three gather in my name,
there am I with them.” Mathew 18:20)
Maybe Jesus understood something about human nature we did
not.
Little wonder then that our last couple of generations, with
a sea of spiritualities and diversions on the other side of a keyboard, have
little or no desire to do what is required
to keep those charming old buildings afloat, much less to be
impassioned on a Sunday morning to go to church.
Our new cathedrals, after all, if we are forthright about
it, are those big-boxes bursting with bargains, a sales flyer for a church
bulletin, and an offering plate up front.
That is where all the cars are on Sunday.
But the big question is, what now?
Where may we find the moral and spiritual guidance, however
imperfect it may have been, that came from the churches of past days? From whence the reminder of human decency
that one saw from afar when approaching our little rural communities? Of the importance of compassion? Of the loving heart? Of community?
Sadly, from where I sit, I do not know the answer to my own
question.
But one never knows.
Maybe new churches will spring up online. Maybe congregations will buy into the idea of
adaptive reuse, wherein other compatible organizations can share space and
responsibilities of support. Maybe some
of the old churches will be repurposed as a new kind of church with new and
younger adherents and a more concise “gospel,” less complex, more relevant, and
tailored to the longings of today’s citizens, young and old alike.
Maybe, maybe, maybe.
But, in the meantime, we should keep our eye on the
ball: whatever happens we need a moral
guiding light of some sort to help keep our social fabric intact and to get us
across the shoals of our uncertain future.
With our churches falling away at an alarming rate – I know
of at least 20, but data is hard to get – we may do well to keep in mind in our
quest for that guiding light the uncomplicated but sweeping theology of one
Rabbi Hillel, who lived in Jerusalem
in the days of King Herod.
When a skeptical young infidel came to him and agreed to
join his church if the rabbi could explain the contents of his holy book while
he stood on one foot, the young man was humbled by the answer he heard. Hillel said, in so many words,
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is the whole book: the rest is commentary.”
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is the whole book: the rest is commentary.”
Ron Macinnis closes off with this request: “Your thoughts on this matter, dear reader,
would be most welcome.”
(promisedland@herald.can)
No comments:
Post a Comment